{"id":76,"date":"2005-07-11T15:01:23","date_gmt":"2005-07-11T20:01:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/2005\/07\/11\/future-shock\/"},"modified":"2005-07-11T15:05:29","modified_gmt":"2005-07-11T20:05:29","slug":"future-shock","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/2005\/07\/11\/future-shock\/","title":{"rendered":"Future Shock"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have piles of books everywhere but brought <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Alvin_Toffler\">Alvin Toffler<\/a>&#8216;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Future_Shock\">Future Shock<\/a> home with me from campus.  I can vaguely remember reading it in college (although that might have been The Third Wave).  Somehow, I just knew it would yield interesting history.  And I wasn&#8217;t wrong.<\/p>\n<p>In the Introduction, Toffler discusses the difficulty of writing when &#8220;the whole world is a fast-breaking story&#8221; (p. 4).  The changing shape of the world leads to the &#8220;perishability of fact,&#8221; and he admits that despite updates, some of his facts will be obsolete by the time the book gets published.  And don&#8217;t forget that I&#8217;m reading it 35 years after it was first published.   More than just the facts have changed.  Rather it seems the whole world has changed, which is, ultimately, Toffler&#8217;s theme.  He points out that the &#8220;obsolescence of data has a special significance here&#8230;serving as it does to verify the book&#8217;s own thesis about the rapidity of change.<\/p>\n<p>He goes on to lament the lot of writers in such a furiously accelerating world:  &#8220;Writers have a harder and harder time keeping up with reality.  We have not yet learned to conceive, research, write and publish in &#8216;real time.&#8217; Readers, therefore, must concern themselves more and more with general theme, rather than detail&#8221; (p. 5)  Since Toffler&#8217;s alive (he runs <a href=\"http:\/\/www.toffler.com\/\">Toffler Associates<\/a>, which appears to be a business consulting firm), I suppose he knows about blogs.  What could be more &#8220;real time&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>But that real time aspect can also lead to trouble.  Will Richardson has several posts related to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.weblogg-ed.com\/2005\/07\/09#a3751\">careful blogging<\/a>.  Richardson points to the story in the <a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/jobs\/2005\/07\/2005070801c.htm?rss\">Chronicle of Higher Education<\/a> about candidates being passed over because of their blogging past.  (Oh dear, maybe I shouldn&#8217;t be posting this&#8230;) And, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hyperorg.com\/blogger\/mtarchive\/004201.html\">David Weinberger<\/a>, from Harvard (who I just saw at NECC) talks about the problem of &#8220;taking it back&#8221; when he discovered that he had reacted incorrectly to a post by a conservative commentator.<\/p>\n<p>Toffler, I think, would forgive Weinberger.  We&#8217;re going to make mistakes in this world of fast-breaking news.  It&#8217;s what we do after we&#8217;ve made the mistake that&#8217;s important.  Weinberger has tried to make it right, and, in the end, his sense of the commentator&#8217;s comments were on the mark.  It was an anti-French sentiment that was inappropriate and deserving of rebuff.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have piles of books everywhere but brought Alvin Toffler&#8216;s Future Shock home with me from campus. I can vaguely remember reading it in college (although that might have been The Third Wave). Somehow, I just knew it would yield interesting history. And I wasn&#8217;t wrong. In the Introduction, Toffler \u2026 <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/2005\/07\/11\/future-shock\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_options":[]},"categories":[],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p31UVs-1e","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/simplykaren.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}